Compare foods · Canned tuna (in water) · Salmon

Protein comparison

Canned tuna (in water) vs Salmon: which has more protein?

Canned tuna (in water) gives you 21.7 g of protein per 3 oz drained; salmon gives you 18.8 g per 3 oz cooked. On equal weight it is 25.5 g against 22.1 g per 100 g. The full side-by-side, from the same USDA-sourced records as the rest of the site:

Protein and calorie figures for Canned tuna (in water) and Salmon, per serving and per 100 g.
MeasureCanned tuna (in water)Salmon
Typical serving3 oz drained (85 g)3 oz cooked (85 g)
Protein per serving21.7 g18.8 g
Protein per 100 g25.5 g22.1 g
Calories per serving99 kcal175 kcal
Protein density88% of calories43% of calories
Share of 50 g Daily Value43%38%
Protein qualityCompleteComplete
CategorySeafoodSeafood

The verdict

Canned tuna (in water) has more protein on equal weight: 25.5 g per 100 g against salmon's 22.1 g, a lead of 3.4 g. Per typical serving, canned tuna (in water) delivers 21.7 g (3 oz drained) to salmon's 18.8 g (3 oz cooked), a difference of 2.9 g.

For the full breakdown of each food, see the protein in canned tuna (in water) and protein in salmon pages, each with its USDA FoodData Central record id.

Quick answers

Canned tuna (in water) vs Salmon FAQ

Which has more protein, canned tuna (in water) or salmon?

Canned tuna (in water) has more protein per 100 g: 25.5 g against 22.1 g. Per typical serving, canned tuna (in water) provides 21.7 g (3 oz drained) and salmon provides 18.8 g (3 oz cooked).

Is canned tuna (in water) or salmon more protein-dense?

Canned tuna (in water) is the more protein-dense of the two: about 88% of its calories come from protein, against 43% for salmon.

Are canned tuna (in water) and salmon complete proteins?

Yes, both. Canned tuna (in water) and salmon each supply all nine essential amino acids in adequate amounts, so either can carry a meal's protein on its own.

Where they rank

Related rankings

More matchups

Related comparisons