| Measure | Lamb chop | Pork chop |
|---|---|---|
| Typical serving | 3 oz cooked (85 g) | 3 oz cooked (85 g) |
| Protein per serving | 21.4 g | 23 g |
| Protein per 100 g | 25.2 g | 27 g |
| Calories per serving | 269 kcal | 196 kcal |
| Protein density | 32% of calories | 47% of calories |
| Share of 50 g Daily Value | 43% | 46% |
| Protein quality | Complete | Complete |
| Category | Meat & poultry | Meat & poultry |
Compare foods · Lamb chop · Pork chop
Protein comparison
Lamb chop vs Pork chop: which has more protein?
Lamb chop gives you 21.4 g of protein per 3 oz cooked; pork chop gives you 23 g per 3 oz cooked. On equal weight it is 25.2 g against 27 g per 100 g. The full side-by-side, from the same USDA-sourced records as the rest of the site:
The verdict
Pork chop has more protein on equal weight: 27 g per 100 g against lamb chop's 25.2 g, a lead of 1.8 g. Per typical serving, pork chop delivers 23 g (3 oz cooked) to lamb chop's 21.4 g (3 oz cooked), a difference of 1.6 g.
For the full breakdown of each food, see the protein in lamb chop and protein in pork chop pages, each with its USDA FoodData Central record id.
Quick answers
Lamb chop vs Pork chop FAQ
Which has more protein, lamb chop or pork chop?
Pork chop has more protein per 100 g: 27 g against 25.2 g. Per typical serving, lamb chop provides 21.4 g (3 oz cooked) and pork chop provides 23 g (3 oz cooked).
Is lamb chop or pork chop more protein-dense?
Pork chop is the more protein-dense of the two: about 47% of its calories come from protein, against 32% for lamb chop.
Are lamb chop and pork chop complete proteins?
Yes, both. Lamb chop and pork chop each supply all nine essential amino acids in adequate amounts, so either can carry a meal's protein on its own.
Where they rank
Related rankings
More matchups