| Measure | Beef chuck roast | Lamb shank |
|---|---|---|
| Typical serving | 3 oz cooked (85 g) | 3 oz cooked (85 g) |
| Protein per serving | 26.4 g | 26.4 g |
| Protein per 100 g | 31.1 g | 31 g |
| Calories per serving | 215 kcal | 159 kcal |
| Protein density | 49% of calories | 66% of calories |
| Share of 50 g Daily Value | 53% | 53% |
| Protein quality | Complete | Complete |
| Category | Meat & poultry | Meat & poultry |
Compare foods · Beef chuck roast · Lamb shank
Protein comparison
Beef chuck roast vs Lamb shank: which has more protein?
Beef chuck roast gives you 26.4 g of protein per 3 oz cooked; lamb shank gives you 26.4 g per 3 oz cooked. On equal weight it is 31.1 g against 31 g per 100 g. The full side-by-side, from the same USDA-sourced records as the rest of the site:
The verdict
On equal weight this is close to a tie: beef chuck roast has 31.1 g of protein per 100 g and lamb shank has 31 g. Per typical serving they are also nearly even: 26.4 g per 3 oz cooked of beef chuck roast against 26.4 g per 3 oz cooked of lamb shank.
For the full breakdown of each food, see the protein in beef chuck roast and protein in lamb shank pages, each with its USDA FoodData Central record id.
Quick answers
Beef chuck roast vs Lamb shank FAQ
Which has more protein, beef chuck roast or lamb shank?
Beef chuck roast has more protein per 100 g: 31.1 g against 31 g. Per typical serving, beef chuck roast provides 26.4 g (3 oz cooked) and lamb shank provides 26.4 g (3 oz cooked).
Is beef chuck roast or lamb shank more protein-dense?
Lamb shank is the more protein-dense of the two: about 66% of its calories come from protein, against 49% for beef chuck roast.
Are beef chuck roast and lamb shank complete proteins?
Yes, both. Beef chuck roast and lamb shank each supply all nine essential amino acids in adequate amounts, so either can carry a meal's protein on its own.
Where they rank
Related rankings
More matchups