Compare foods · Beef chuck roast · Emu

Protein comparison

Beef chuck roast vs Emu: which has more protein?

Beef chuck roast gives you 26.4 g of protein per 3 oz cooked; emu gives you 26.6 g per 3 oz cooked. On equal weight it is 31.1 g against 31.3 g per 100 g. The full side-by-side, from the same USDA-sourced records as the rest of the site:

Protein and calorie figures for Beef chuck roast and Emu, per serving and per 100 g.
MeasureBeef chuck roastEmu
Typical serving3 oz cooked (85 g)3 oz cooked (85 g)
Protein per serving26.4 g26.6 g
Protein per 100 g31.1 g31.3 g
Calories per serving215 kcal131 kcal
Protein density49% of calories81% of calories
Share of 50 g Daily Value53%53%
Protein qualityCompleteComplete
CategoryMeat & poultryMeat & poultry

The verdict

On equal weight this is close to a tie: beef chuck roast has 31.1 g of protein per 100 g and emu has 31.3 g. Per typical serving they are also nearly even: 26.4 g per 3 oz cooked of beef chuck roast against 26.6 g per 3 oz cooked of emu.

For the full breakdown of each food, see the protein in beef chuck roast and protein in emu pages, each with its USDA FoodData Central record id.

Quick answers

Beef chuck roast vs Emu FAQ

Which has more protein, beef chuck roast or emu?

Emu has more protein per 100 g: 31.3 g against 31.1 g. Per typical serving, beef chuck roast provides 26.4 g (3 oz cooked) and emu provides 26.6 g (3 oz cooked).

Is beef chuck roast or emu more protein-dense?

Emu is the more protein-dense of the two: about 81% of its calories come from protein, against 49% for beef chuck roast.

Are beef chuck roast and emu complete proteins?

Yes, both. Beef chuck roast and emu each supply all nine essential amino acids in adequate amounts, so either can carry a meal's protein on its own.

Where they rank

Related rankings

More matchups

Related comparisons