| Measure | Bottom round steak | Pulled pork |
|---|---|---|
| Typical serving | 3 oz cooked (85 g) | 1 cup (249 g) |
| Protein per serving | 29.2 g | 32.9 g |
| Protein per 100 g | 34.3 g | 13.2 g |
| Calories per serving | 184 kcal | 418 kcal |
| Protein density | 64% of calories | 31% of calories |
| Share of 50 g Daily Value | 58% | 66% |
| Protein quality | Complete | Complete |
| Category | Meat & poultry | Meat & poultry |
Compare foods · Bottom round steak · Pulled pork
Protein comparison
Bottom round steak vs Pulled pork: which has more protein?
Bottom round steak gives you 29.2 g of protein per 3 oz cooked; pulled pork gives you 32.9 g per 1 cup. On equal weight it is 34.3 g against 13.2 g per 100 g. The full side-by-side, from the same USDA-sourced records as the rest of the site:
The verdict
Bottom round steak has more protein on equal weight: 34.3 g per 100 g against pulled pork's 13.2 g, a lead of 21.1 g. The order flips per serving because the servings differ in size: per typical serving, pulled pork delivers 32.9 g (1 cup) to bottom round steak's 29.2 g (3 oz cooked), a difference of 3.7 g.
For the full breakdown of each food, see the protein in bottom round steak and protein in pulled pork pages, each with its USDA FoodData Central record id.
Quick answers
Bottom round steak vs Pulled pork FAQ
Which has more protein, bottom round steak or pulled pork?
Bottom round steak has more protein per 100 g: 34.3 g against 13.2 g. Per typical serving, bottom round steak provides 29.2 g (3 oz cooked) and pulled pork provides 32.9 g (1 cup).
Is bottom round steak or pulled pork more protein-dense?
Bottom round steak is the more protein-dense of the two: about 64% of its calories come from protein, against 31% for pulled pork.
Are bottom round steak and pulled pork complete proteins?
Yes, both. Bottom round steak and pulled pork each supply all nine essential amino acids in adequate amounts, so either can carry a meal's protein on its own.
Where they rank
Related rankings
More matchups