Compare foods · Bottom round steak · Conch

Protein comparison

Bottom round steak vs Conch: which has more protein?

Bottom round steak gives you 29.2 g of protein per 3 oz cooked; conch gives you 33.4 g per 1 cup sliced. On equal weight it is 34.3 g against 26.3 g per 100 g. The full side-by-side, from the same USDA-sourced records as the rest of the site:

Protein and calorie figures for Bottom round steak and Conch, per serving and per 100 g.
MeasureBottom round steakConch
Typical serving3 oz cooked (85 g)1 cup sliced (127 g)
Protein per serving29.2 g33.4 g
Protein per 100 g34.3 g26.3 g
Calories per serving184 kcal165 kcal
Protein density64% of calories81% of calories
Share of 50 g Daily Value58%67%
Protein qualityCompleteComplete
CategoryMeat & poultrySeafood

The verdict

Bottom round steak has more protein on equal weight: 34.3 g per 100 g against conch's 26.3 g, a lead of 8 g. The order flips per serving because the servings differ in size: per typical serving, conch delivers 33.4 g (1 cup sliced) to bottom round steak's 29.2 g (3 oz cooked), a difference of 4.2 g.

For the full breakdown of each food, see the protein in bottom round steak and protein in conch pages, each with its USDA FoodData Central record id.

Quick answers

Bottom round steak vs Conch FAQ

Which has more protein, bottom round steak or conch?

Bottom round steak has more protein per 100 g: 34.3 g against 26.3 g. Per typical serving, bottom round steak provides 29.2 g (3 oz cooked) and conch provides 33.4 g (1 cup sliced).

Is bottom round steak or conch more protein-dense?

Conch is the more protein-dense of the two: about 81% of its calories come from protein, against 64% for bottom round steak.

Are bottom round steak and conch complete proteins?

Yes, both. Bottom round steak and conch each supply all nine essential amino acids in adequate amounts, so either can carry a meal's protein on its own.

Where they rank

Related rankings

More matchups

Related comparisons