| Measure | Conch | Whelk |
|---|---|---|
| Typical serving | 1 cup sliced (127 g) | 3 oz cooked (85 g) |
| Protein per serving | 33.4 g | 40.5 g |
| Protein per 100 g | 26.3 g | 47.7 g |
| Calories per serving | 165 kcal | 234 kcal |
| Protein density | 81% of calories | 69% of calories |
| Share of 50 g Daily Value | 67% | 81% |
| Protein quality | Complete | Complete |
| Category | Seafood | Seafood |
Compare foods · Conch · Whelk
Protein comparison
Conch vs Whelk: which has more protein?
Conch gives you 33.4 g of protein per 1 cup sliced; whelk gives you 40.5 g per 3 oz cooked. On equal weight it is 26.3 g against 47.7 g per 100 g. The full side-by-side, from the same USDA-sourced records as the rest of the site:
The verdict
Whelk has more protein on equal weight: 47.7 g per 100 g against conch's 26.3 g, a lead of 21.4 g. Per typical serving, whelk delivers 40.5 g (3 oz cooked) to conch's 33.4 g (1 cup sliced), a difference of 7.1 g.
For the full breakdown of each food, see the protein in conch and protein in whelk pages, each with its USDA FoodData Central record id.
Quick answers
Conch vs Whelk FAQ
Which has more protein, conch or whelk?
Whelk has more protein per 100 g: 47.7 g against 26.3 g. Per typical serving, conch provides 33.4 g (1 cup sliced) and whelk provides 40.5 g (3 oz cooked).
Is conch or whelk more protein-dense?
Conch is the more protein-dense of the two: about 81% of its calories come from protein, against 69% for whelk.
Are conch and whelk complete proteins?
Yes, both. Conch and whelk each supply all nine essential amino acids in adequate amounts, so either can carry a meal's protein on its own.
Where they rank
Related rankings
More matchups