| Measure | Elk | Pulled pork |
|---|---|---|
| Typical serving | 3 oz cooked (85 g) | 1 cup (249 g) |
| Protein per serving | 25.7 g | 32.9 g |
| Protein per 100 g | 30.2 g | 13.2 g |
| Calories per serving | 124 kcal | 418 kcal |
| Protein density | 83% of calories | 31% of calories |
| Share of 50 g Daily Value | 51% | 66% |
| Protein quality | Complete | Complete |
| Category | Meat & poultry | Meat & poultry |
Compare foods · Elk · Pulled pork
Protein comparison
Elk vs Pulled pork: which has more protein?
Elk gives you 25.7 g of protein per 3 oz cooked; pulled pork gives you 32.9 g per 1 cup. On equal weight it is 30.2 g against 13.2 g per 100 g. The full side-by-side, from the same USDA-sourced records as the rest of the site:
The verdict
Elk has more protein on equal weight: 30.2 g per 100 g against pulled pork's 13.2 g, a lead of 17 g. The order flips per serving because the servings differ in size: per typical serving, pulled pork delivers 32.9 g (1 cup) to elk's 25.7 g (3 oz cooked), a difference of 7.2 g.
For the full breakdown of each food, see the protein in elk and protein in pulled pork pages, each with its USDA FoodData Central record id.
Quick answers
Elk vs Pulled pork FAQ
Which has more protein, elk or pulled pork?
Elk has more protein per 100 g: 30.2 g against 13.2 g. Per typical serving, elk provides 25.7 g (3 oz cooked) and pulled pork provides 32.9 g (1 cup).
Is elk or pulled pork more protein-dense?
Elk is the more protein-dense of the two: about 83% of its calories come from protein, against 31% for pulled pork.
Are elk and pulled pork complete proteins?
Yes, both. Elk and pulled pork each supply all nine essential amino acids in adequate amounts, so either can carry a meal's protein on its own.
Where they rank
Related rankings
More matchups