| Measure | Emu | Pulled pork |
|---|---|---|
| Typical serving | 3 oz cooked (85 g) | 1 cup (249 g) |
| Protein per serving | 26.6 g | 32.9 g |
| Protein per 100 g | 31.3 g | 13.2 g |
| Calories per serving | 131 kcal | 418 kcal |
| Protein density | 81% of calories | 31% of calories |
| Share of 50 g Daily Value | 53% | 66% |
| Protein quality | Complete | Complete |
| Category | Meat & poultry | Meat & poultry |
Compare foods · Emu · Pulled pork
Protein comparison
Emu vs Pulled pork: which has more protein?
Emu gives you 26.6 g of protein per 3 oz cooked; pulled pork gives you 32.9 g per 1 cup. On equal weight it is 31.3 g against 13.2 g per 100 g. The full side-by-side, from the same USDA-sourced records as the rest of the site:
The verdict
Emu has more protein on equal weight: 31.3 g per 100 g against pulled pork's 13.2 g, a lead of 18.1 g. The order flips per serving because the servings differ in size: per typical serving, pulled pork delivers 32.9 g (1 cup) to emu's 26.6 g (3 oz cooked), a difference of 6.3 g.
For the full breakdown of each food, see the protein in emu and protein in pulled pork pages, each with its USDA FoodData Central record id.
Quick answers
Emu vs Pulled pork FAQ
Which has more protein, emu or pulled pork?
Emu has more protein per 100 g: 31.3 g against 13.2 g. Per typical serving, emu provides 26.6 g (3 oz cooked) and pulled pork provides 32.9 g (1 cup).
Is emu or pulled pork more protein-dense?
Emu is the more protein-dense of the two: about 81% of its calories come from protein, against 31% for pulled pork.
Are emu and pulled pork complete proteins?
Yes, both. Emu and pulled pork each supply all nine essential amino acids in adequate amounts, so either can carry a meal's protein on its own.
Where they rank
Related rankings
More matchups