| Measure | Lamb shank | Pulled pork |
|---|---|---|
| Typical serving | 3 oz cooked (85 g) | 1 cup (249 g) |
| Protein per serving | 26.4 g | 32.9 g |
| Protein per 100 g | 31 g | 13.2 g |
| Calories per serving | 159 kcal | 418 kcal |
| Protein density | 66% of calories | 31% of calories |
| Share of 50 g Daily Value | 53% | 66% |
| Protein quality | Complete | Complete |
| Category | Meat & poultry | Meat & poultry |
Compare foods · Lamb shank · Pulled pork
Protein comparison
Lamb shank vs Pulled pork: which has more protein?
Lamb shank gives you 26.4 g of protein per 3 oz cooked; pulled pork gives you 32.9 g per 1 cup. On equal weight it is 31 g against 13.2 g per 100 g. The full side-by-side, from the same USDA-sourced records as the rest of the site:
The verdict
Lamb shank has more protein on equal weight: 31 g per 100 g against pulled pork's 13.2 g, a lead of 17.8 g. The order flips per serving because the servings differ in size: per typical serving, pulled pork delivers 32.9 g (1 cup) to lamb shank's 26.4 g (3 oz cooked), a difference of 6.5 g.
For the full breakdown of each food, see the protein in lamb shank and protein in pulled pork pages, each with its USDA FoodData Central record id.
Quick answers
Lamb shank vs Pulled pork FAQ
Which has more protein, lamb shank or pulled pork?
Lamb shank has more protein per 100 g: 31 g against 13.2 g. Per typical serving, lamb shank provides 26.4 g (3 oz cooked) and pulled pork provides 32.9 g (1 cup).
Is lamb shank or pulled pork more protein-dense?
Lamb shank is the more protein-dense of the two: about 66% of its calories come from protein, against 31% for pulled pork.
Are lamb shank and pulled pork complete proteins?
Yes, both. Lamb shank and pulled pork each supply all nine essential amino acids in adequate amounts, so either can carry a meal's protein on its own.
Where they rank
Related rankings
More matchups