Compare foods · Lamb shoulder · Pulled pork

Protein comparison

Lamb shoulder vs Pulled pork: which has more protein?

Lamb shoulder gives you 27.9 g of protein per 3 oz cooked; pulled pork gives you 32.9 g per 1 cup. On equal weight it is 32.8 g against 13.2 g per 100 g. The full side-by-side, from the same USDA-sourced records as the rest of the site:

Protein and calorie figures for Lamb shoulder and Pulled pork, per serving and per 100 g.
MeasureLamb shoulderPulled pork
Typical serving3 oz cooked (85 g)1 cup (249 g)
Protein per serving27.9 g32.9 g
Protein per 100 g32.8 g13.2 g
Calories per serving241 kcal418 kcal
Protein density46% of calories31% of calories
Share of 50 g Daily Value56%66%
Protein qualityCompleteComplete
CategoryMeat & poultryMeat & poultry

The verdict

Lamb shoulder has more protein on equal weight: 32.8 g per 100 g against pulled pork's 13.2 g, a lead of 19.6 g. The order flips per serving because the servings differ in size: per typical serving, pulled pork delivers 32.9 g (1 cup) to lamb shoulder's 27.9 g (3 oz cooked), a difference of 5 g.

For the full breakdown of each food, see the protein in lamb shoulder and protein in pulled pork pages, each with its USDA FoodData Central record id.

Quick answers

Lamb shoulder vs Pulled pork FAQ

Which has more protein, lamb shoulder or pulled pork?

Lamb shoulder has more protein per 100 g: 32.8 g against 13.2 g. Per typical serving, lamb shoulder provides 27.9 g (3 oz cooked) and pulled pork provides 32.9 g (1 cup).

Is lamb shoulder or pulled pork more protein-dense?

Lamb shoulder is the more protein-dense of the two: about 46% of its calories come from protein, against 31% for pulled pork.

Are lamb shoulder and pulled pork complete proteins?

Yes, both. Lamb shoulder and pulled pork each supply all nine essential amino acids in adequate amounts, so either can carry a meal's protein on its own.

Where they rank

Related rankings

More matchups

Related comparisons