| Measure | Bluefin tuna | Whelk |
|---|---|---|
| Typical serving | 3 oz cooked (85 g) | 3 oz cooked (85 g) |
| Protein per serving | 25.4 g | 40.5 g |
| Protein per 100 g | 29.9 g | 47.7 g |
| Calories per serving | 156 kcal | 234 kcal |
| Protein density | 65% of calories | 69% of calories |
| Share of 50 g Daily Value | 51% | 81% |
| Protein quality | Complete | Complete |
| Category | Seafood | Seafood |
Compare foods · Bluefin tuna · Whelk
Protein comparison
Bluefin tuna vs Whelk: which has more protein?
Bluefin tuna gives you 25.4 g of protein per 3 oz cooked; whelk gives you 40.5 g per 3 oz cooked. On equal weight it is 29.9 g against 47.7 g per 100 g. The full side-by-side, from the same USDA-sourced records as the rest of the site:
The verdict
Whelk has more protein on equal weight: 47.7 g per 100 g against bluefin tuna's 29.9 g, a lead of 17.8 g. Per typical serving, whelk delivers 40.5 g (3 oz cooked) to bluefin tuna's 25.4 g (3 oz cooked), a difference of 15.1 g.
For the full breakdown of each food, see the protein in bluefin tuna and protein in whelk pages, each with its USDA FoodData Central record id.
Quick answers
Bluefin tuna vs Whelk FAQ
Which has more protein, bluefin tuna or whelk?
Whelk has more protein per 100 g: 47.7 g against 29.9 g. Per typical serving, bluefin tuna provides 25.4 g (3 oz cooked) and whelk provides 40.5 g (3 oz cooked).
Is bluefin tuna or whelk more protein-dense?
Whelk is the more protein-dense of the two: about 69% of its calories come from protein, against 65% for bluefin tuna.
Are bluefin tuna and whelk complete proteins?
Yes, both. Bluefin tuna and whelk each supply all nine essential amino acids in adequate amounts, so either can carry a meal's protein on its own.
Where they rank
Related rankings
More matchups