| Measure | Cuttlefish | Whelk |
|---|---|---|
| Typical serving | 3 oz cooked (85 g) | 3 oz cooked (85 g) |
| Protein per serving | 27.6 g | 40.5 g |
| Protein per 100 g | 32.5 g | 47.7 g |
| Calories per serving | 134 kcal | 234 kcal |
| Protein density | 82% of calories | 69% of calories |
| Share of 50 g Daily Value | 55% | 81% |
| Protein quality | Complete | Complete |
| Category | Seafood | Seafood |
Compare foods · Cuttlefish · Whelk
Protein comparison
Cuttlefish vs Whelk: which has more protein?
Cuttlefish gives you 27.6 g of protein per 3 oz cooked; whelk gives you 40.5 g per 3 oz cooked. On equal weight it is 32.5 g against 47.7 g per 100 g. The full side-by-side, from the same USDA-sourced records as the rest of the site:
The verdict
Whelk has more protein on equal weight: 47.7 g per 100 g against cuttlefish's 32.5 g, a lead of 15.2 g. Per typical serving, whelk delivers 40.5 g (3 oz cooked) to cuttlefish's 27.6 g (3 oz cooked), a difference of 12.9 g.
For the full breakdown of each food, see the protein in cuttlefish and protein in whelk pages, each with its USDA FoodData Central record id.
Quick answers
Cuttlefish vs Whelk FAQ
Which has more protein, cuttlefish or whelk?
Whelk has more protein per 100 g: 47.7 g against 32.5 g. Per typical serving, cuttlefish provides 27.6 g (3 oz cooked) and whelk provides 40.5 g (3 oz cooked).
Is cuttlefish or whelk more protein-dense?
Cuttlefish is the more protein-dense of the two: about 82% of its calories come from protein, against 69% for whelk.
Are cuttlefish and whelk complete proteins?
Yes, both. Cuttlefish and whelk each supply all nine essential amino acids in adequate amounts, so either can carry a meal's protein on its own.
Where they rank
Related rankings
More matchups