| Measure | Octopus | Whelk |
|---|---|---|
| Typical serving | 3 oz cooked (85 g) | 3 oz cooked (85 g) |
| Protein per serving | 25.3 g | 40.5 g |
| Protein per 100 g | 29.8 g | 47.7 g |
| Calories per serving | 139 kcal | 234 kcal |
| Protein density | 73% of calories | 69% of calories |
| Share of 50 g Daily Value | 51% | 81% |
| Protein quality | Complete | Complete |
| Category | Seafood | Seafood |
Compare foods · Octopus · Whelk
Protein comparison
Octopus vs Whelk: which has more protein?
Octopus gives you 25.3 g of protein per 3 oz cooked; whelk gives you 40.5 g per 3 oz cooked. On equal weight it is 29.8 g against 47.7 g per 100 g. The full side-by-side, from the same USDA-sourced records as the rest of the site:
The verdict
Whelk has more protein on equal weight: 47.7 g per 100 g against octopus's 29.8 g, a lead of 17.9 g. Per typical serving, whelk delivers 40.5 g (3 oz cooked) to octopus's 25.3 g (3 oz cooked), a difference of 15.2 g.
For the full breakdown of each food, see the protein in octopus and protein in whelk pages, each with its USDA FoodData Central record id.
Quick answers
Octopus vs Whelk FAQ
Which has more protein, octopus or whelk?
Whelk has more protein per 100 g: 47.7 g against 29.8 g. Per typical serving, octopus provides 25.3 g (3 oz cooked) and whelk provides 40.5 g (3 oz cooked).
Is octopus or whelk more protein-dense?
Octopus is the more protein-dense of the two: about 73% of its calories come from protein, against 69% for whelk.
Are octopus and whelk complete proteins?
Yes, both. Octopus and whelk each supply all nine essential amino acids in adequate amounts, so either can carry a meal's protein on its own.
Where they rank
Related rankings
More matchups